The Side Tripper

I find the notion of people fighting for the love of country deeply admirable. However, I struggle to comprehend why there’s a push for the reinstatement of ROTC (Reserve Officers’ Training Corps) or similar programs. Advocates often cite discipline and national defense as reasons, but I believe the nature of warfare has evolved beyond traditional concepts.

In today’s world, the battlefield extends far beyond physical confrontation. Modern warfare encompasses technology, cyber threats, and strategic intelligence. Gone are the days of hand-to-hand combat being the primary mode of conflict. Instead, it’s about pushing buttons that unleash bombs and missiles or orchestrating cyberattacks.

If we’re preparing future generations to safeguard our nation, shouldn’t we equip them with the intellectual tools to navigate this complex landscape? Discipline, too, isn’t solely cultivated through regimented training at the age of 18. It begins much earlier, within families and communities. By instilling discipline and values from an early age, we lay the groundwork for responsible citizenship.

Moreover, the decision to engage in war isn’t simply a matter of military readiness; it’s also a question of resources and economics. Countries don’t plunge into conflict lightly, as it requires vast resources and financial backing. By focusing on bolstering our economy and diplomatic efforts, we can deter aggression without relying solely on military might.

In essence, while honoring the spirit of defending freedom and the love of country is crucial, our approach must adapt to contemporary realities. Rather than clinging to outdated paradigms, we should invest in education, diplomacy, and technology to safeguard our future. As for our lawmaker, I will suggest prioritizing practical arts and home economics instead, as I believe these skills remain relevant and valuable in everyday life.